Travel + Work — A Failed Experiment (2014 edition)

Why traveling and working didn’t work out for me, the reasons behind and how to continue.

6 Months Traveling and Working

Since end of November 2013 I put myself into the position of working while traveling. It all sounds like a peanut butter or a piece of cake. At the end of April 2014 I found out for myself that it’s not even an little piece of cake. Here’s why:

You are barely or never in the moment. Nothing is worse and more frustrating, especially for fellow travelers, to have one person not paying attention. Because when you work on a project while you are geographically at the beach in the Philippines, you won’t be able to cope with both things — enjoying / relaxing and working — if you don’t keep them separated.

Don’t be rushy while you travel and work. Make sure you can stay in one place for a while, a week or so, so you can adjust and build up a little routine for your working hours.

It’s not healthy and prevents you, the by default distracted person, to stay sane when you think about projects (work) while you are at the most beautiful places in the world.

Conclusion

Clearly distinguish work and travel. You can work for 6 months, and travel for the other 6. You can travel for 3 months and work for 9 months. Or you can just work your way all the way through 2, 3, 4 or 5 years while you take your little breaks every three months or get 1 year off every 7 years like Stefan Sagmeister (from Sagmeisterwalsh) does.

But you don’t wanna merge both — just like a distinction of work and personal leisure time is crucial. Things will merge into each other anyway. Your effort must be put into reducing it [the merging process] to a sane level.

PS: This is old old standpoint of mine which I wrote (on May 6, 2014) because I also had a project that didn’t work out well while traveling. So I was double-frustrated about the unsuccessful project and me not being able to be mentally there with my travel partner. Right now, I found a way that works for me.

j j j

Are You An Owl, A Bird Or Both? And Why The Answer Doesn’t Matter

When are you actually going to bed? And when do you wake up? There’s always a big discussion when you talk about bio clocks, waking up early to use the day (e.g. for writing) or things like the B-society.

A German farmer’s saying goes like:

Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. (The early bird catches the worm.)

Farmers still exist and with all the eco and sustainability trends going on there will be even more rather than less in the future, I’m assuming.

However, I’m writing as a „digital native“ here, so my focus should be on the perspective on all these digital information workers. Should it really? So, what’s the actual value of waking up early?

Value of waking up early

Let’s have a look what Pieter Levels, a pretty known self-called „digital nomad“ (Pieter, correct me if I’m wrong that you call yourself like that) arguments:

There’s no reason to think of waking up early as a quality.

He’s referring to the context that waking up early is perceived by the majority of society as a sign of quality.

While I agree with Pieter when he says that it’s „ridiculous“ to assume waking up early is a virtue you religiously need to stick to, I see the quality of waking up early in the connection with the surrounding (nature).

Learning Nature

As an always-connected city person, as far as I know Pieter is and I’m as well, you don’t really speak Nature. Yes, Nature is a language. And yes, cities have parks and green parts but I’m talking nature that you can feel, breath and live with(in), nature that you start to understand when you spend enough time in it, just like in your students exchange times in Germany to learn German. Potentially, you learn the language you are surrounded with: When surrounded by nerds, you learn nerd stuff. When surrounded by coders and write, you learn code and writing. When surrounded by Nature, you learn to read and write Nature.

Making nature your ally means you follow its rules, so to say. That includes: When the sun rises, you rise. When the sun goes down, you go to bed. You don’t have to follow – you can do whatever you want. But if you do, you are rewarded with a synchronization an iCloud-Sync can’t give you. Making nature your ally makes every participant of it (flora and fauna) an implicit ally.

Connecting to nature

Accordingly, what connection do you have when you don’t follow Mother Nature’s dictatorship (intentionally exaggerated)?

Who are you in sync with? With you own values? Sure. With people who use their time liberated from constraints like you? Definitely. How much a-synchronicity can you actually handle and don’t lose connection to people whose life-work’s clocks tick differently? I don’t know. Do you know? How archaic is it to to think that an alignment with nature (the natural ecosystem) is important for your inner ecosystem (internal balance)?

Digital liberty and natural constraints

In essence I’m feeling the total liberation of time on the one hand (thanks mainly to the internet and people getting more and more what it offers in terms of life-work options and paradigm shifts) and a longing for the rhythm of nature and following its melodies.

I’m wondering: How does a generally digital work-lifestyle with artificial (i.e. handmade) liberations, constructions (metaphorically) and constraints having a strong emphasis on a connection to technology go hand in hand an with a nature-centered approach in your work-lifestyle whose strong connection is built up through the raw tangibility of things. How is the outer world you’re work-living in a mirror of your inner world?

Thinking of Ghost In The Shell and leaving you with these thoughts.

j j j

Is Being A Digital Nomad A Lie?

Hacker News: Is Being a Digital Nomad a Lie?

Hacker News: Is Being a Digital Nomad a Lie?

Pretext: Only if you believe (in) it, it can become a lie (that affects you). If you don’t mind and let it pass — like you do with a lot of things in life because you can’t save everything and everyone from the sickness of this world — then the discussion / trend / hype of being a Digital Nomad will only be a side-topic or not a topic at all — like bad commercials.

However, if you feel called by the term because you sense that it could be related to what you’re doing, you’re wanting to do it or dream of doing it, here’s my view and more extensive response than my initial comment on Facebook, a kind-of response to what Yann Girard initially wrote under the title „The digital nomad lie“ (originally found on Facebook).

Remote or location-independent

From my perception and conversations with people who apply this kind of lifestyle (fully or partly) the term „Digital Nomad“ is something they don’t like that much. To be a „Remote Worker“ comes closer to what identifies them, and I personally like being called „remote worker“ (working location-independent like that most of the time since 2008) more than being a nomad because it sounds more down to earth.

Read More

j j j